Please read this before using the forum: This forum is to be used ONLY for topics regarding BattleGroup42 and Battlefield 1942, the game it is based on.

It is NOT intended for advertising other mods, games or any kind of commercial stuff. All posts and topics not related to the mod or Battlefield 1942 (only the main game and its official expansions) will be deleted without prior notice.


Feedback/Personal opinion of the Tiger I tracks.  

  RSS

Skull Kid
(@skull-kid-the-lonesome-loner)
New Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 3
17/03/2019 9:07 am  

Hello to one and all!

I have noticed the looks the tracks of the Tiger I in BattleGroup42. In my opinion (correct me if I'm wrong) the tracks looks more realistic in vanilla, than in BattleGroup42.

This is the way I see the tracks on the real Tiger I. I can not put a finger on it, but something looks off on the tracks of the early and late Tiger I in BattleGroup42. I run release candidate 4, with the latest February patch applied.


Quote
Skull Kid
(@skull-kid-the-lonesome-loner)
New Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 3
19/03/2019 7:38 pm  
Posted by: Skull Kid

Hello to one and all!

I have noticed the looks the tracks of the Tiger I in BattleGroup42. In my opinion (correct me if I'm wrong) the tracks looks more realistic in vanilla, than in BattleGroup42.

This is the way I see the tracks on the real Tiger I. I can not put a finger on it, but something looks off on the tracks of the early and late Tiger I in BattleGroup42. I run release candidate 4, with the latest February patch applied.

Although as said, this is how I see it. I could be completely wrong. I believe you dev's knows best 🙂


ReplyQuote
SargeSurfat
(@sargesurfat)
Member Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 20
01/04/2019 10:41 am  

What do you mean it looks "wrong"? Texture? Runpath? Behavior?


ReplyQuote
al13326
(@al13326)
Eminent Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 38
07/04/2019 1:00 pm  

I think Skull kid was referring to Tiger I tank's track texture.

Here's the track of Tiger I tank that are currently used:

And here's the same render in January 2009 news update:

 

This post was modified 5 months ago 2 times by al13326

ReplyQuote
SargeSurfat
(@sargesurfat)
Member Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 20
07/04/2019 11:26 pm  

Hm. I took a closer look to the texture and it seems realistic to me, though I must admit that it is always difficult to represent 3D structures on a flat surface.


ReplyQuote
Skull Kid
(@skull-kid-the-lonesome-loner)
New Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 3
12/04/2019 6:06 pm  

Thanks Al for clearing that up! Yes, indeed I think the older texture looks better.

But of course I can imagine you get tons of different opinions in the suggestion area, so mine is just a piece of feedback 🙂


ReplyQuote